Home Metrics Timely Permanency

Timely Permanency by State

% achieving permanency within 12 months of entry. FY2022 data — all states ranked.

41.8%

National Average

48.2%

Highest

34.8%

Lowest (Worst)

▲ Good

Higher = Better

What the FY2022 Timely Permanency Data Reveals

Across all 51 reporting states and the District of Columbia, timely permanency averaged 41.8% in FY2022. The best-performing state — Vermont — recorded 48.2%, while the weakest result was 34.8%. For this metric, higher values indicate stronger outcomes for children and families, because % achieving permanency within 12 months of entry. The gap between best and worst — 13.4% — shows how much practice, policy, and funding differ across jurisdictions even under the same federal AFCARS reporting framework.

Timely Permanency is one of eight core performance indicators PlainFoster tracks from the federal Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS). States submit this data annually to the Administration for Children and Families. The FY2022 reporting cycle covers the federal fiscal year ending September 30, 2022. State-level variation reflects differences in caseload sizes, caseworker staffing ratios, availability of family support and kinship resources, court system throughput, and state statutory definitions of reunification, adoption, and permanency. No single metric captures child welfare performance in isolation — PlainFoster combines reunification, adoption, aging out, placement stability, length of stay, re-entry, timely permanency, and maltreatment recurrence into each state's letter grade.

When reading the rankings table below, bear in mind that states operating under consent decrees, recent legislative reforms, or significant caseload shifts may show year-over-year changes that don't reflect long-term trends. A state ranking high on reunification may rank lower on placement stability, and vice versa — trade-offs are common in child welfare policy. Percentages express the share of applicable children or cases meeting the criterion. This data is informational and does not substitute for child welfare agency consultation, state caseworker guidance, or legal advice in specific foster care situations. Use it to understand how your state compares and where federal and state-level improvement efforts are most needed.

All States — Ranked by Timely Permanency

# State Grade Timely Permanency
1 Vermont A 48.2%
2 New York A 47.4%
3 Massachusetts A 46.8%
4 Rhode Island A 46.4%
5 New Hampshire A 46.1%
6 Maine A 45.9%
7 New Jersey B 45.8%
8 Hawaii A 45.6%
9 Washington B 45.4%
10 Minnesota B 45.2%
11 Virginia B 44.9%
12 Connecticut A 44.8%
13 Utah B 44.6%
14 Iowa B 44.3%
15 California B 44.2%
16 Maryland B 44.1%
17 Oregon B 43.8%
18 Wisconsin B 43.6%
19 Michigan B 43.4%
20 Delaware B 43.2%
21 Pennsylvania B 43.2%
22 Illinois B 43.1%
23 District of Columbia B 42.8%
24 Nebraska B 42.6%
25 Idaho B 42.4%
26 Colorado B 42.1%
27 Kansas B 41.8%
28 North Carolina B 41.6%
29 Texas B 41.4%
30 Arizona B 41.3%
31 Wyoming B 41.2%
32 Ohio B 40.4%
33 Georgia B 40.3%
34 Missouri B 40.1%
35 South Carolina B 39.8%
36 Florida B 39.6%
37 Nevada B 39.4%
38 Tennessee B 39.2%
39 Indiana B 38.9%
40 North Dakota B 38.8%
41 Alabama B 38.2%
42 Oklahoma B 38.1%
43 Montana B 37.8%
44 Kentucky B 37.6%
45 Arkansas C 37.4%
46 Louisiana B 37.2%
47 South Dakota B 37.1%
48 Mississippi C 36.2%
49 Alaska C 36.1%
50 New Mexico C 35.6%
51 West Virginia C 34.8%

Other Metrics

Frequently Asked Questions

What is timely permanency in foster care?

% achieving permanency within 12 months of entry. This metric is tracked by the federal Administration for Children and Families through the AFCARS reporting system, with all states required to submit data annually.

Which state has the best timely permanency?

The top-ranked state for timely permanency is Vermont at 48.2%. Higher values indicate better outcomes. The national average is 41.8%.

How is timely permanency calculated?

Timely Permanency is calculated from AFCARS data submitted by state child welfare agencies to the Administration for Children and Families. It measures % achieving permanency within 12 months of entry. The FY2022 data reflects the federal fiscal year ending September 30, 2022.

Why does timely permanency vary so much between states?

State-level variation reflects differences in child welfare policies, funding, caseload sizes, availability of family support services, and how states define and report outcomes. States with stronger family preservation programs and kinship care resources tend to have more favorable metrics.

Foster Care Guides

Explore Related Data

Source: Administration for Children and Families, AFCARS Report FY2022. acf.hhs.gov

All federal data sources used on this page

Related

Data sourced from official U.S. government datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainFoster Editorial

Source: U.S. ACF — AFCARS Foster Care Reports Foster care placement, exit, and outcome statistics · 2025